2021/11/05 by Giuseppe Castagna · 3 voices · 3 citations
Computer Science · #Logic, programming, and type systems #Formal Methods in Verification #Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
paper · pdf · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-34518-0_12
In this essay, I present the advantages and, I dare say, the beauty of programming in a language with set-theoretic types, that is, types that include union, intersection, and negation type connectives. I show by several examples how set-theoretic types are necessary to type some common programming patterns, but also how they play a key role in typing several language constructs-from branching and pattern matching to function overloading and type-cases-very precisely. I start by presenting the theory of types known as semantic subtyping and extend it to include polymorphic types. Next, I discuss the design of languages that use these types. I start by defining a theoretical framework that covers all the examples given in the first part of the presentation. Since the system of the framework cannot be effectively implemented, I then describe three effective restrictions of this system: (i) a polymorphic language with explicitly-typed functions, (ii) an implicitly-typed polymorphic language à la Hindley-Milner, and (iii) a monomorphic language that, by implementing classic union-elimination, precisely reconstructs intersection types for functions and implements a very general form of occurrence typing. I conclude the presentation with a short overview of other aspects of these languages, such as pattern matching, gradual typing, and denotational semantics.