2003/05/01 by Sharon Inkelas, Cemil Orhan Orgun · 3 citations
Psychology · Social Sciences · Arts and Humanities · Mathematics · Medicine · #Phonetics and Phonology Research #Linguistic Variation and Morphology #Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation #Turkish #Argument (complex analysis) #Stress (linguistics) #Contrast (vision) #Econometrics #Psychology #Computer science #Mathematics #Linguistics #Philosophy #Artificial intelligence #Medicine
paper · doi:10.1017/s0952675703004482
openalex publication_date 2003/05/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/16
This work evaluates an argument recently made in these pages by Kabak & Vogel (2001) to the effect that the analysis of Turkish which they develop is superior on theoretical grounds to that of past accounts. Kabak & Vogel explicitly contrast their account to that offered in two recent, comprehensive discussions of Turkish stress by Inkelas & Orgun (1998) and Inkelas (1999). Careful consideration of the data discussed by Kabak & Vogel and by Inkelas & Orgun, as well as some additional data introduced in this paper, shows that the original Inkelas & Orgun analysis achieves greater empirical coverage while using less theoretical machinery.