2013/09/07 by David Robertson · 14 citations
Arts and Humanities · Psychology · #Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices #Theology and Philosophy of Evil #Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs #Epistemology #History #Philosophy
paper · doi:10.1558/ijsnr.v4i1.27
published in International Journal for the Study of New Religions 4(1), 27-47 (Equinox Publishing)
openalex publication_date 2013/09/07 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/02
Despite its considerable currency in popular culture, David Icke’s Reptilian Thesis is almost always viewed academically as irrational and anti-Semitic. Here, I suggest that it be considered instead against a) traditional conceptualizations of “evil,” and b) the development of the New Age milieu. The need to reconcile a holistic, relativizing construction of evil with the perceived failure of the New Age to arrive was keenly felt in the New Age milieu through the 1990s and 2000s. An Other had to exist, yet could not be constructed as human. The Reptilian Thesis introduces a theodicy into New Age, of a globalized, extra-terrestrial Other. Icke’s Reptilian Thesis seeks to portray the extra-terrestrial as that which is, literally, “alien,” in order to explain away the perceived failure of the New Age. The New Age, Icke suggests, did not fail to arrive, but was prevented from arriving. The Reptilian Thesis is therefore not so much a departure from New Age Theodicy, but a reconfiguration of it.