vix.ing · top · new · best · stats

AGN Selection Methods Have Profound Impacts on the Distributions of Host-galaxy Properties

2021/07/31 by Zhiyuan Ji, Mauro Giavalisco, Allison Kirkpatrick +7 · 34 citations
Physics and Astronomy · #Astrophysics #Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies #Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena #Galaxy #Physics #Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies #astro-ph.GA

paper · pdf · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac3837

published in The Astrophysical Journal 925(1), 74 (IOP Publishing) · 26 pages, 28 figures; published in ApJ; https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac3837

openalex publication_date 2022/01/01 · arxiv created 2022/01/26 · arxiv updated 2022/01/27 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05

Abstract

Abstract We present a comparative study of X-ray and IR active galactic nuclei (AGNs) at z ≈ 2 to highlight the important AGN selection effects on the distributions of host-galaxy properties. Compared with non-AGN star-forming galaxies (SFGs) on the main sequence, X-ray AGNs have similar median star formation (SF) properties, but their incidence ( q AGN ) is higher among galaxies with either enhanced or suppressed SF, and among galaxies with a larger stellar-mass surface density, regardless if it is measured within the half-light radius (Σ e ) or central 1 kpc (Σ 1kpc ). Unlike X-ray AGNs, IR AGNs are less massive and have enhanced SF and similar distributions of colors, Σ e and Σ 1kpc , relative to non-AGN SFGs. Given that Σ e and Σ 1kpc strongly correlate with M * , we introduce the fractional mass within the central 1 kpc ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kpc</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>∗</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ), which only weakly depends on M * , to quantify galaxy compactness. Both AGN populations have similar <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kpc</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>∗</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> distributions compared to non-AGN SFGs’. While q AGN increases with Σ e and Σ 1kpc , it remains constant with <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kpc</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>∗</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , indicating that the trend of increasing q AGN with Σ is driven by M * more than morphology. While our findings are not in conflict with the scenario of AGN quenching, they do not imply it either, because the incidence of AGNs hosted in transitional galaxies depends crucially on AGN selections. Additionally, despite the relatively large uncertainty of AGN bolometric luminosities, their very weak correlation, if any, with SF activities, regardless of AGN selections, also argues against a direct causal link between the presence of AGNs and the quenching of massive galaxies at z ∼ 2.

Citations