vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Graphene Layer Morphology as an Indicator of the Metal Alloy Formation at the Interface

2020/12/09 by Elena Voloshina, Beate Paulus, Yuriy Dedkov
Chemistry · Materials Science · Physics and Astronomy · #Alloy #Chemical physics #Chemistry #Composite material #Computational chemistry #Condensed matter physics #Density functional theory #Graphene #Graphene research and applications #Inorganic chemistry #Intercalation (chemistry) #Layer (electronics) #Materials science #Metal #Metallurgy #Nanotechnology #Optoelectronics #Phase (matter) #Quantum and electron transport phenomena #Quantum tunnelling #Scanning tunneling microscope #Surface and Thin Film Phenomena #cond-mat.mtrl-sci

paper · pdf · doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c03271

published as J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 12, 19 (2021)

openalex publication_date 2020/12/09 · arxiv created 2021/12/22 · arxiv updated 2021/12/28 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05

Abstract

The intercalation of different species in graphene-metal interfaces is widely used to stabilize the artificial phases of different materials, which in some cases leads to the formation of the surface alloys between atoms of the guest metal and the substrate. Here, the interfaces of graphene with Ru(0001) and Ir(111) were modified using intercalation of a thin Mn layer and investigated by means of scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) accompanied by density functional theory (DFT) calculations. It is found that Mn forms a pseudomorphic layer on Ru(0001) under a strongly buckled graphene layer. In the case of Mn intercalation in graphene/Ir(111), a buried thin layer of MnIr alloy is formed beneath the first Ir layer under a flat graphene layer. This unexpected observation is explained on the basis of phase diagram pictures for the Mn-Ru and Mn-Ir systems as well as via comparison of calculated total energies for the respective interfaces.

Citations