vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

When does the mean network capture the topology of a sample of networks?

2024/08/06 by François G. Meyer, Meyer, François G
Physics and Astronomy · #Complex Network Analysis Techniques #Data Analysis #FOS: Computer and information sciences #FOS: Physical sciences #Machine Learning (cs.LG) #Machine Learning (stat.ML) #Social and Information Networks (cs.SI) #Statistics and Probability (physics.data-an)

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.03461

openalex publication_date 2024/08/06 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

The notion of Fréchet mean (also known as "barycenter") network is the workhorse of most machine learning algorithms that require the estimation of a "location" parameter to analyse network-valued data. In this context, it is critical that the network barycenter inherits the topological structure of the networks in the training dataset. The metric - which measures the proximity between networks - controls the structural properties of the barycenter. This work is significant because it provides for the first time analytical estimates of the sample Fréchet mean for the stochastic blockmodel, which is at the cutting edge of rigorous probabilistic analysis of random networks. We show that the mean network computed with the Hamming distance is unable to capture the topology of the networks in the training sample, whereas the mean network computed using the effective resistance distance recovers the correct partitions and associated edge density. From a practical standpoint, our work informs the choice of metrics in the context where the sample Fréchet mean network is used to characterise the topology of networks for network-valued machine learning

Related