1997/01/01 by James J. Heckman, James Heckman · 843 citations
Economics, Econometrics and Finance · Mathematics · Psychology · Social Sciences · #Advanced Causal Inference Techniques #Econometrics #Economics #Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth #Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics #Instrumental variable #Psychology #Social psychology
paper · doi:10.2307/146178
published in The Journal of Human Resources 32(3), 441 (University of Wisconsin Press)
openalex publication_date 1997/01/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/23
This paper considers the use of instrumental variables to estimate the mean effect of treatment on the treated, the mean effect of treatment on randomly selected persons and the local average treatment effect. It examines what economic questions these parameters address. When responses to treatment vary, the standard argument justifying the use of instrumental variables fails unless person-specific responses to treatment do not influence decisions to participate in the program being evaluated. This requires that individual gains from the program that cannot be predicted from variables in outcome equations do not influence the decision of the persons being studied to participate in the program. In the likely case in which individuals possess and act on private information about gains from the program that cannot be fully predicted by variables in the outcome equation, instrumental variables methods do not estimate economically interesting evaluation parameters. Instrumental variable methods are extremely sensitive to assumptions about how people process information. These arguments are developed for both continuous and discrete treatment variables and several explicit economic models are presented.