vix.ing · top · new · best · stats

On the Robustness of Phosphine Signatures in Venus' Clouds

2020/12/10 by Jane S. Greaves, William Bains, Janusz J. Petkowski +8
Physics and Astronomy · #astro-ph.EP #astro-ph.IM

paper · pdf · doi:10.1038/s41550-021-01423-y

published as Nature Astronomy 5.7 (2021): 726-728 · Response to: Snellen I. et al. Astron. Astroph., in press, arXiv:2010:09761 (2020); Villanueva G. et al. Nat. Ast. Matters Arising; arXiv:2010.14305 (2020); Thompson M. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., in press, arXiv:2010.15118 (2020); Submitted to Nature Astronomy "Matters Arising" on Dec/10/2020

arxiv created 2020/12/10 · arxiv updated 2021/07/21

Abstract

We published spectra of phosphine molecules in Venus' clouds, following open-science principles in releasing data and scripts (with community input leading to ALMA re-processing, now benefiting multiple projects). Some misconceptions about de-trending of spectral baselines have also emerged, which we address here. Using the JCMT PH3-discovery data, we show that mathematically-correct polynomial fitting of periodic ripples does not lead to "fake lines" (probability < ~1%). We then show that the ripples can be characterised in a non-subjective manner via Fourier transforms. A 20 ppb PH3 feature is ~5σ compared to the JCMT baseline-uncertainty, and is distinctive as a narrow perturber of the periodic ripple pattern. The structure of the FT-derived baseline also shows that polynomial fitting, if unguided, can amplify artefacts and so artificially reduce significance of real lines.

Citations