2021/06/15 by Richard J. Stancliffe · 18 citations
Chemistry · Physics and Astronomy · #Accretion (finance) #Astro and Planetary Science #Astronomy #Astrophysics #Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies #Barium #Binary star #Chemistry #Context (archaeology) #Ejecta #Physics #Roche lobe #Stars #Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies #Supernova #astro-ph.SR
paper · pdf · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1734
published in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 505(4), 5554-5566 (Oxford University Press) · 13 pages, 7 figures. Accepted for publication in MNRAS 14/6/21
arxiv created 2021/06/15 · openalex publication_date 2021/06/17 · arxiv updated 2021/06/30 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05
ABSTRACT We examine the composition of barium stars in the context of mass transfer from an asymptotic giant branch (AGB) companion. We accrete between 0.01 and 0.5 M⊙ of AGB ejecta on to low-mass companions of [Fe/H] = −0.25 at the ages expected for the end of the lives of AGB stars of 2.5, 3, and 4 M⊙. In each case, we form a star of 2.5 M⊙ that is thought to be a typical barium star mass. We discuss the extent of dilution of accreted material as the star evolves, and describe the impact on the surface abundances. For accretion from a 2.5 M⊙ primary, if the secondary’s initial mass is 2.45 M⊙ or more, accretion takes place when the secondary is undergoing core helium burning. Using data from the sample of De Castro et al., we attempt to fit the observed properties of 74 barium giants using the models we have computed. We find that all but six of these objects are best fit using ejecta from 2.5 M⊙ (32 objects) or 3 M⊙ (36 objects) AGB stars. Higher accretion masses are typically required when accreting from a lower mass companion. We find accretion masses that are broadly consistent with recent hydrodynamical simulations of wind mass transfer, though the accretion efficiency is towards the upper limit found in these simulations. For the 18 stars with reported orbital periods, we find no strong correlations between period and accretion mass.