vix.ing · top · new · best · stats

Ab initio Calculations of Energy Levels in Be-Like Xenon: Strong Interference between Electron-Correlation and QED Effects

2020/09/30 by A. V. Malyshev, D. A. Glazov, Y. S. Kozhedub +5 · 23 citations
Physics and Astronomy · #Ab initio #Advanced Chemical Physics Studies #Atomic and Molecular Physics #Atomic physics #Electron #Electronic correlation #Excited state #Feynman diagram #Perturbation theory (quantum mechanics) #Physics #Quantum electrodynamics #Quantum mechanics #Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics #Xenon #physics.atom-ph

paper · pdf · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.183001

published in Physical Review Letters 126(18), 183001 (American Physical Society) · 2 tables, 1 figure

openalex created_date 2020/09/08 · arxiv created 2021/03/28 · openalex publication_date 2021/05/03 · arxiv updated 2021/05/12 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05

Abstract

The strong mixing of close levels with two valence electrons in Be-like xenon greatly complicates ab initio QED calculations beyond the first-order approximation. Because of a strong interplay between the electron-electron correlation and QED effects, the standard single-level perturbative QED approach may fail, even if it takes into account the second-order screened QED diagrams. In the present Letter, the corresponding obstacles are overcome by working out the QED perturbation theory for quasidegenerate states. The contributions of all the Feynman diagrams up to the second order are taken into account. The many-electron QED effects are rigorously evaluated in the framework of the extended Furry picture to all orders in the nuclear-strength parameter αZ. The higher-order electron-correlation effects are considered within the Breit approximation. The nuclear recoil effect is accounted for as well. The developed approach is applied to high-precision QED calculations of the ground and singly excited energy levels in Be-like xenon. The most accurate theoretical predictions for the binding and excitation energies are obtained. These results deviate from the most precise experimental value by 3σ but perfectly agree with a more recent measurement.

Citations