2014/06/16 by Nazlı Avdan · 1 citation
Social Sciences · Psychology · #Migration, Refugees, and Integration #Migration, Health and Trauma #Migration and Labor Dynamics #Terrorism #Nexus (standard) #European union #Political science #Securitization #Underpinning #Political economy #Expansive #Member states #Security policy #Refugee #Sociology #Law #International trade #Economics #Computer security
paper · doi:10.1177/1465116514534908
openalex publication_date 2014/06/16 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/18
Scholars assume that transnational terrorism has culminated in policy securitization with expansive restrictions on migration. I evaluate the impact of transnational terrorism on asylum recognition among European Union and Schengen member-states from 1980 until 2007. I unpack the impact of terrorism according to the location of incidents. The article illustrates that policy tightening is more pronounced when recipient states experience terrorism on their own soil or against their citizens. In contrast, measuring transnational terrorism as attacks worldwide mutes the impact of security concerns. The findings show that policy stringency is not directed against particular sources of terrorism and demonstrates that the humanitarian principles underpinning asylum recognition have not been eroded by terrorism. The article thus represents an important step in differentiating between channels of impact whereby transnational terror shapes policy outcomes.