vix.ing · top · new · best · stats

Search for Radio Remnants of Nearby Off-axis Gamma-Ray Bursts in a Sample of Swift/BAT Events

2020/08/12 by C. Grandorf, J. McCarty, P. Rajkumar +9 · 7 citations
Physics and Astronomy · #Afterglow #Binary number #Flare #Flux (metallurgy) #Gamma-ray burst #Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae #Gravitational wave #Kilonova #Neutron star #Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research #Redshift #Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life #astro-ph.GA #astro-ph.HE

paper · pdf · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abd315

published in The Astrophysical Journal 908(1), 63 (IOP Publishing) · 8 pages, 1 Figure

arxiv created 2020/08/12 · openalex created_date 2020/08/18 · openalex publication_date 2021/02/01 · arxiv updated 2021/02/24 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05

Abstract

Abstract The multi-messenger discovery of gravitational waves (GWs) and light from the binary neutron star (NS) merger GW170817, associated with gamma-ray burst (GRB) 170817A and kilonova AT2017gfo, has marked the start of a new era in astrophysics. GW170817 has confirmed that binary NS mergers are progenitors of at least some short GRBs. The peculiar properties of the GRB 170817A radio afterglow, characterized by a delayed onset related to the off-axis geometry, have also demonstrated how some nearby short GRBs may not be identified as such with standard short-timescale electromagnetic follow-up observations. Building upon this new information, we performed late-time radio observations of a sample of four short GRBs with unknown redshift and no previously detected afterglow in the Swift/BAT sample in order to identify nearby ( Mpc) off-axis GRB candidates via their potential late-time radio signatures. We find a previously uncatalogued radio source within the error region of GRB 130626 with a flux density consistent with an NS radio flare at a distance of ∼100 Mpc. An origin related to a persistent radio source unrelated to the GRB cannot be excluded nor confirmed given the high chance of false positives in error regions as large as those considered here, and the limited time baseline of our observations. Further radio (and X-ray) follow-up observations are needed to better understand the origin of this source.

Citations