2021/01/22 by Daniel Buschek, Martin Zürn, Malin Eiband · 106 citations
Computer Science · Psychology · #Artificial intelligence #Cognitive science #Composition (language) #Computer science #Ideation #Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning #Linguistics #Natural language processing #Phrase #Psychology #Software Engineering Research #Topic Modeling #Word (group theory) #cs.CL #cs.HC
paper · pdf · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445372
21 pages, 4 figures, ACM CHI 2021
arxiv created 2021/01/22 · arxiv updated 2021/01/25 · openalex publication_date 2021/05/06 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/06
We present an in-depth analysis of the impact of multi-word suggestion choices from a neural language model on user behaviour regarding input and text composition in email writing. Our study for the first time compares different numbers of parallel suggestions, and use by native and non-native English writers, to explore a trade-off of “efficiency vs ideation”, emerging from recent literature. We built a text editor prototype with a neural language model (GPT-2), refined in a prestudy with 30 people. In an online study (N=156), people composed emails in four conditions (0/1/3/6 parallel suggestions). Our results reveal (1) benefits for ideation, and costs for efficiency, when suggesting multiple phrases; (2) that non-native speakers benefit more from more suggestions; and (3) further insights into behaviour patterns. We discuss implications for research, the design of interactive suggestion systems, and the vision of supporting writers with AI instead of replacing them.