2020/11/26 by Haotian Zhu, Denise Mak, Jesse Gioannini +1 · 1 citation
Computer Science · Mathematics · #cs.CL #stat.AP
published as Proceedings of the 1st Conference of the Asia-Pacific Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 10th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations (2020) 40-46 · Will appear in AACL-IJCNLP 2020
arxiv created 2020/11/26 · arxiv updated 2020/12/17
Statistical significance testing centered on p-values is commonly used to compare NLP system performance, but p-values alone are insufficient because statistical significance differs from practical significance. The latter can be measured by estimating effect size. In this paper, we propose a three-stage procedure for comparing NLP system performance and provide a toolkit, NLPStatTest, that automates the process. Users can upload NLP system evaluation scores and the toolkit will analyze these scores, run appropriate significance tests, estimate effect size, and conduct power analysis to estimate Type II error. The toolkit provides a convenient and systematic way to compare NLP system performance that goes beyond statistical significance testing