vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Web services considered harmful?

2005/01/01 by Rohit Khare, Jeff Barr, Mark Baker +3 · 1 citation
Computer Science · #Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services #World Wide Web #Web service #Computer science #RSS #SOAP #XML #Web standards #Grassroots #WS-Policy #Web development #Web application #Web 2.0 #WS-Addressing #Service-oriented architecture #Web application security #Web modeling #The Internet #Vendor #Business #Political science

paper · doi:10.1145/1062745.1062758

openalex publication_date 2005/01/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/19

Abstract

It has been estimated that all of the Web Services specifications and proposals ("WS-*") weigh in at several thousand pages by now. At the same time, their predecessor technologies such as XML-RPC have developed alongside other "grassroots" technologies like RSS. This debate has arguably even risen to the architectural level, contrasting "service-oriented architectures" with REST-based architectural styles. Unfortunately, the multiple overlapping specifications, standards bodies, and vendor strategies tend to obscure the very real successes of providing machine-automatable services over the Web today. This panel asks: Are current community processes for developing, debating, and adopting Web Services are helping or hindering the adoption of Web Services technology? URL: <http://labs.commerce.net/wiki/images/1/19/CN-TR-04-05.pdf.

Cited by