2020/06/30 by Mohammad Ahmady, Satvir Kaur, Chandan Mondal +1
Physics and Astronomy · #Atomic physics #Black Holes and Theoretical Physics #Meson #Omega #Particle physics #Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies #Physics #Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions #Quantum mechanics #Radiative transfer #Spin (aerodynamics) #hep-ph
paper · pdf · doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.034021
published as Phys. Rev. D 102, 034021 (2020) · 20 pages, 5 figures; Revised version that specifies the differences between the holographic meson wave function and other models. References updated, results unchanged. Accepted by PRD
arxiv created 2020/07/24 · openalex publication_date 2020/08/19 · arxiv updated 2020/08/21 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05
We predict the V\ensuremath→P\ensuremathγ decay widths and the V\ensuremath→P\ensuremathγ* transition form factors, where V=(\ensuremathρ,\ensuremathω,K*,\ensuremathφ) and P=(\ensuremathπ,K,\ensuremathη,\ensuremathη^\ensuremath'), using spin-improved holographic light-front wave functions for the mesons. We find excellent agreement with the available data for both the decay widths and the timelike transition form factors extracted from the leptonic conversion decays V\ensuremath→Pl+l^\ensuremath-.