vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Shortcomings of meta-GGA functionals when describing magnetism

2020/04/30 by Fabien Tran, Guillaume Baudesson, Jesús Carrete +4
Materials Science · Mathematics · Physics and Astronomy · #Antiferromagnetism #Computer science #Condensed matter physics #Data mining #Ferromagnetism #Magnetic Properties and Applications #Magnetic moment #Magnetic properties of thin films #Magnetism #Materials science #Mathematics #Physics #Relation (database) #Statistical physics #ZnO doping and properties #cond-mat.mtrl-sci

paper · pdf · doi:10.1103/physrevb.102.024407

published as Phys. Rev. B 102, 024407 (2020)

arxiv created 2020/06/02 · openalex publication_date 2020/07/06 · arxiv updated 2020/07/08 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05

Abstract

Several recent studies have shown that SCAN, a functional belonging to the meta-generalized gradient approximation (MGGA) family, leads to significantly overestimated magnetic moments in itinerant ferromagnetic metals. However, this behavior is not inherent to the MGGA level of approximation since TPSS, for instance, does not lead to such severe overestimations. In order to provide a broader view of the accuracy of MGGA functionals for magnetism, we extend the assessment to more functionals but also to antiferromagnetic solids. The results show that to describe magnetism there is overall no real advantage in using a MGGA functional compared to GGAs. For both types of approximation, an improvement in ferromagnetic metals is necessarily accompanied by a deterioration (underestimation) in antiferromagnetic insulators, and vice versa. We also provide some analysis in order to understand in more detail the relation between the mathematical form of the functionals and the results.

Citations