vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm: Performance, Mechanism, and Implementation on Near-Term Devices

2018/12/31 by Leo Zhou, Sheng-Tao Wang, Soonwon Choi +2 · 9 citations
Computer Science · Physics and Astronomy · #Adiabatic process #Benchmark (surveying) #Constructive #Heuristic #Initialization #Quantum #Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture #Quantum Information and Cryptography #Quantum annealing #Simulated annealing #Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies #cond-mat.dis-nn #cond-mat.stat-mech #quant-ph

paper · pdf · doi:10.1103/physrevx.10.021067

published as Phys. Rev. X 10, 021067 (2020) · 13+10 pages, 15 figures

openalex created_date 2018/12/11 · arxiv created 2019/11/09 · openalex publication_date 2020/06/24 · arxiv updated 2020/06/26 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05

Abstract

The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is a hybrid quantum-classical variational algorithm designed to tackle combinatorial optimization problems. Despite its promise for near-term quantum applications, not much is currently understood about the QAOA's performance beyond its lowestdepth variant. An essential but missing ingredient for understanding and deploying the QAOA is a constructive approach to carry out the outer-loop classical optimization. We provide an in-depth study of the performance of the QAOA on MaxCut problems by developing an efficient parameter-optimization procedure and revealing its ability to exploit nonadiabatic operations. Building on observed patterns in optimal parameters, we propose heuristic strategies for initializing optimizations to find quasioptimal p-level QAOA parameters in Opolyp time, whereas the standard strategy of random initialization requires 2 Op optimization runs to achieve similar performance. We then benchmark the QAOA and compare it with quantum annealing, especially on difficult instances where adiabatic quantum annealing fails due to small spectral gaps. The comparison reveals that the QAOA can learn via optimization to utilize nonadiabatic mechanisms to circumvent the challenges associated with vanishing spectral gaps. Finally, we provide a realistic resource analysis on the experimental implementation of the QAOA. When quantum fluctuations in measurements are accounted for, we illustrate that optimization is important only for problem sizes beyond numerical simulations but accessible on near-term devices. We propose a feasible implementation of large MaxCut problems with a few hundred vertices in a system of 2D neutral atoms, reaching the regime to challenge the best classical algorithms.

Citations

Cited by