vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Can negative bare couplings make sense? The ϕ4 theory at large N

2023/10/04 by Ryan Weller, Weller, Ryan D.
Physics and Astronomy · #Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research #Black Holes and Theoretical Physics #FOS: Physical sciences #High Energy Physics - Phenomenology (hep-ph) #High Energy Physics - Theory (hep-th) #Nuclear Theory (nucl-th) #Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.02516

openalex publication_date 2023/10/04 · openalex created_date 2023/10/06 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/01

Abstract

Scalar λϕ4 theory in 3+1D, for a positive coupling constant λ>0, is known to have no interacting continuum limit, which is referred to as quantum triviality. However, it has been recently argued that the theory in 3+1D with an N-component scalar ϕ and a (ϕ⋅ϕ) 2 4 interaction term does have an interacting continuum limit at large N. It has been suggested that this continuum limit has a negative (bare) coupling constant and exhibits asymptotic freedom, similar to the PT-symmetric -gϕ4 field theory. In this paper I study the ϕ 4 theory in 3+1D at large N with a negative coupling constant -g<0, and with the scalar field taking values in a PT-symmetric complex domain. The theory is non-trivial, has asymptotic freedom, and has a Landau pole in the IR, and I demonstrate that the thermal partition function matches that of the positive-coupling λ>0 theory when the Landau poles of the two theories (in the λ>0 case a pole in the UV) are identified with one another. The spirit of renormalization is that observables do not depend on the renormalization scale. Here we see even if the coupling is taken negative above the scale of the Landau pole, thermodynamic observables are unaffected. Thus the ϕ 4 theory at large N appears to have a negative bare coupling constant; the coupling only becomes positive in the IR, which in the context of other PT-symmetric and large-N quantum field theories I argue is perfectly acceptable.

Related