2016/07/01 by Rakesh Ankit · 1 citation
Social Sciences · Arts and Humanities · #South Asian Studies and Conflicts #South Asian Studies and Diaspora #Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East #Sovereignty #Independence (probability theory) #Colonialism #State (computer science) #Accession #Colonial rule #Political science #Partition (number theory) #Dominion #Ancient history #Law #Political economy #Economic history #History #Sociology #Politics
paper · doi:10.1177/0019464616651167
openalex publication_date 2016/07/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/01
By revisiting the events from July 1947 to February 1948 that comprised the accession of the princely state of Junagadh to India, this article gives an insight into the newly independent Dominion’s ‘mobilisation of violence’ in re-fashioning its sovereignty and authority. In doing so, it adds to the growing historical literature on state formation in India that argues that multiple crises of the period 1947–49—post-partition violence in Punjab and Delhi, rebellion, accession and war in Kashmir and the so-called ‘police-action’ in Hyderabad—far from being aberrations to the emerging Indian nation-state were, instead, affairs through which its new sovereignty evolved. The mobilisation of Indian defence forces in the lead up to the accession of Junagadh in November 1947 and the management of violence directed at Junagadh’s Muslims afterwards are yet another instance of the forcible incorporation of Indian princely states and Indian Muslims into the reconstructed post-colonial state. Present in this matrix were also the ‘sub-states’ within Junagadh and the attendant questions of their autonomy, an instrumentalist alarmism about popular will and unrest and a hastily conducted referendum. These aspects of this contested accession have remained overshadowed in the historical record and are here revised to provide an alternative narrative.