2021/06/24 by Alice Sullivan · 1 citation
Arts and Humanities · Psychology · #Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes #Census #Legislature #Meaning (existential) #Context (archaeology) #Politics #Sociology #Identity (music) #Political science #Law #Public administration #Psychology #Demography #Geography
paper · pdf · doi:10.1111/1467-923x.13029
openalex publication_date 2021/06/24 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/29
Abstract On 17 March 2021, just four days before the England and Wales census date, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) conceded in a judicial review case. The case concerned the meaning of the sex question in the census, and the guidance to accompany this question. How did the ONS end up in court defending its guidance on a question which most people would deem self‐explanatory? This article explains the legislative and political context around gender recognition, and the consequences for data collection. Drawing on my own experiences, I explore the politicisation of the definition of sex, and argue that the ONS gave undue weight to lobby groups with a particular viewpoint on sex and gender identity.