2025/07/20 by James Hickson, Jack Newman · 1 voice
Social Sciences · #Political Systems and Governance #European and International Law Studies
paper · pdf · doi:10.1111/1467-923x.13570
Abstract There is an increasingly powerful argument for the decentralisation of policy making in England's highly centralised political context. In recent years, this issue has represented one of the clearest examples of consensus in the UK's increasingly polarised party politics. However, this consensus has risked obscuring the conflicting justifications and ambitions of English devolution that have been stitched together by successive governments. In this article, we consider three common justifications of English devolution: that it enhances democracy; that it promotes policy efficacy and government efficiency; and that it disrupts concentrations of power. Since 2010, these justifications of devolution have all been prominent features of government policy rhetoric, but there has been little reflection on the tensions between them and the different implications they have for the design of devolution in practice. This paper demonstrates why reconciling these inherent tensions will be critical to the long‐term stability of the devolution project in England.