vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

A science of chimeras? The implications of illusionism for non-human consciousness research

2025/11/11 by Leonard Dung, François Kammerer · 1 voice
Psychology · Neuroscience · #Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs #Social Representations and Identity #Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

paper · pdf · doi:10.1080/09515089.2025.2587227

Abstract

Illusionism states that phenomenal consciousness does not exist, even though it seems to exist. While illusionism is controversial, it is a serious contender among theories of consciousness. We argue that it has substantial and non-trivial implications for non-human consciousness research (NHCR), particularly for the study of the distribution of phenomenal consciousness across beings. If illusionism is true, NHCR can be pursued if conceptualized as investigating the distribution of quasi-phenomenal consciousness, i.e. the states which are misrepresented as phenomenally conscious in humans. However, we argue that knowing the distribution of quasi-phenomenal consciousness is not highly informative. For this reason, illusionism suggests that some approaches to NHCR should be preferred over others. Approaches which focus on features that provide valuable information about non-human cognition independently of their supposed relation to consciousness retain much of their value if illusionism is true. We propose a “zombie test” and five specific heuristics to help identifying such features. Consequently, empirical researchers who take illusionism seriously gain a reason to prioritize some methodological approaches over others.

Citations

Discussions

Related