2026/06/11 by Ricardo Rey-Sáez, Alicia Franco-Martínez, Javier Revuelta +1 · 1 voice · 1 citation
Decision Sciences · Psychology · #Cognitive Abilities and Testing #Construct (python library) #Discriminative model #Factor analysis #Gaussian #Gaussian process #Item response theory #Latent variable #Latent variable model #Mental Health Research Topics #Mixture model #Psychometric Methodologies and Testing #Psychometrics
paper · doi:10.1037/met0000846
published in Psychological Methods (American Psychological Association)
openalex publication_date 2026/06/11 · openalex created_date 2026/06/12 · openalex updated_date 2026/06/26
To address Cronbach's longstanding call to unify experimental and correlational psychology, hierarchical factor models (HFMs) have emerged as a promising approach to estimate individual differences while accounting for trial-level noise. As formalized by Rouder et al. (2025), this framework assumes Gaussian response times and operates in raw units. Here, we generalize this framework by introducing the standardized generalized HFM (GenHFM), which incorporates two natural extensions: Explicitly modeling asymmetric distributions and implementing a fully standardized latent structure. First, modeling asymmetry allows us to capture the true shape of response times and, crucially, quantify the bias introduced by fitting Gaussian HFMs to skewed data. Second, the standardized parameterization ensures transparent prior specification and facilitates the analysis of factor loadings, enabling researchers to directly compare the degree of association between experimental effects and common factors, regardless of their original metrics. Consequently, this allows researchers to evaluate the discriminative capacity of each task regarding the latent process, mirroring the assessment of construct validity in classical psychometrics within experimental settings. We conducted a simulation study showing that Gaussian HFMs can underestimate true correlations by up to 50%, whereas GenHFM yields unbiased and more efficient estimates. Finally, we reanalyze data from two published studies using executive control tasks to illustrate the empirical application of these models. Furthermore, we show that GenHFM achieves better predictive accuracy than alternative models typically used in the field. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).