vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistants

2023/11/21 by Grégoire Mialon, Mialon, Grégoire, Clémentine Fourrier +9 · 6 voices · 238 citations
Computer Science · Medicine · #Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education #Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) #Topic Modeling #cs.AI #cs.CL

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.12983

openalex publication_date 2023/11/21 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

We introduce GAIA, a benchmark for General AI Assistants that, if solved, would represent a milestone in AI research. GAIA proposes real-world questions that require a set of fundamental abilities such as reasoning, multi-modality handling, web browsing, and generally tool-use proficiency. GAIA questions are conceptually simple for humans yet challenging for most advanced AIs: we show that human respondents obtain 92% vs. 15% for GPT-4 equipped with plugins. This notable performance disparity contrasts with the recent trend of LLMs outperforming humans on tasks requiring professional skills in e.g. law or chemistry. GAIA's philosophy departs from the current trend in AI benchmarks suggesting to target tasks that are ever more difficult for humans. We posit that the advent of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) hinges on a system's capability to exhibit similar robustness as the average human does on such questions. Using GAIA's methodology, we devise 466 questions and their answer. We release our questions while retaining answers to 300 of them to power a leader-board available at https://huggingface.co/gaia-benchmark.

Cited by

Discussions

Related