2023/10/16 by Matthias Schaufelberger, Reinald Kühle, Schaufelberger, Matthias +19
Arts and Humanities · Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology · Medicine · #Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments #FOS: Electrical engineering #Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies #Image and Video Processing (eess.IV) #Medical and Biological Sciences #electronic engineering #information engineering
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.10199
openalex publication_date 2023/10/16 · openalex created_date 2023/10/18 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
Introduction: Photogrammetric surface scans provide a radiation-free option to assess and classify craniosynostosis. Due to the low prevalence of craniosynostosis and high patient restrictions, clinical data is rare. Synthetic data could support or even replace clinical data for the classification of craniosynostosis, but this has never been studied systematically. Methods: We test the combinations of three different synthetic data sources: a statistical shape model (SSM), a generative adversarial network (GAN), and image-based principal component analysis for a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based classification of craniosynostosis. The CNN is trained only on synthetic data, but validated and tested on clinical data. Results: The combination of a SSM and a GAN achieved an accuracy of more than 0.96 and a F1-score of more than 0.95 on the unseen test set. The difference to training on clinical data was smaller than 0.01. Including a second image modality improved classification performance for all data sources. Conclusion: Without a single clinical training sample, a CNN was able to classify head deformities as accurate as if it was trained on clinical data. Using multiple data sources was key for a good classification based on synthetic data alone. Synthetic data might play an important future role in the assessment of craniosynostosis.