2016/04/01 by Johanna Dale · 8 citations
Arts and Humanities · #Medieval Literature and History #Reformation and Early Modern Christianity #Historical and Religious Studies of Rome #Liturgy #Monarchy #Empire #Politics #Rite #Ancient history #Roman Empire #History #Narrative #Classics #Art #Law #Political science #Literature #Archaeology
paper · pdf · doi:10.1093/gerhis/ghw014
published in German History 34(2), 191-213 (Oxford University Press)
openalex publication_date 2016/04/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/19
The Gregorian reform movement in general, and events at Canossa in 1077 in particular, have been credited with tarnishing the lustre of sacral kingship within the Empire. In this paper narrative, liturgical and material sources are drawn upon, to demonstrate the extent to which the image of kingship within the Hohenstaufen Empire continued to be rooted in biblical and liturgical soil. The paper focuses on the ritual of inauguration and draws a distinction between royal and imperial ceremonies. This makes it apparent that, while scholars have been right to stress the extent to which papal alterations to the imperial rite undermined the liturgical associations of the imperial office, the imperial liturgy developed by the papal curia in Rome had negligible impact on the royal inauguration liturgy used in Aachen. On the contrary, German monarchs continued to make lively use of inauguration liturgy to emphasize, in the face of papal opprobrium, the divinely ordained nature of their rule.