2016/04/05 by T. Edward Turner, Graeme T. Swindles, Dan J. Charman +5 · 2 citations
Earth and Planetary Sciences · Environmental Science · #Geology and Paleoclimatology Research #Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology #Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics #Solar variation #Proxy (statistics) #Climate change #Solar irradiance #Climatology #Environmental science #Holocene #Forcing (mathematics) #Geography #Meteorology #Geology #Computer science
paper · pdf · doi:10.1038/srep23961
openalex publication_date 2016/04/05 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/31
Many studies have reported evidence for solar-forcing of Holocene climate change across a range of archives. These studies have compared proxy-climate data with records of solar variability (e.g. (14)C or (10)Be), or have used time series analysis to test for the presence of solar-type cycles. This has led to some climate sceptics misrepresenting this literature to argue strongly that solar variability drove the rapid global temperature increase of the twentieth century. As proxy records underpin our understanding of the long-term processes governing climate, they need to be evaluated thoroughly. The peatland archive has become a prominent line of evidence for solar forcing of climate. Here we examine high-resolution peatland proxy climate data to determine whether solar signals are present. We find a wide range of significant periodicities similar to those in records of solar variability: periods between 40-100 years, and 120-140 years are particularly common. However, periodicities similar to those in the data are commonly found in random-walk simulations. Our results demonstrate that solar-type signals can be the product of random variations alone, and that a more critical approach is required for their robust interpretation.