2005/08/01 by Marshall T. Wilkinson, John Chappell, Geoff S. Humphreys +3 · 2 citations
Earth and Planetary Sciences · Environmental Science · Computer Science · #Geology and Paleoclimatology Research #Landslides and related hazards #Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping #Geology #Soil production function #Cosmogenic nuclide #Saprolite #Landform #Holocene #Vegetation (pathology) #Soil horizon #Substrate (aquarium) #Soil science #Erosion #Quaternary #Geomorphology #Soil water #Pedogenesis #Paleontology
paper · doi:10.1002/esp.1254
openalex publication_date 2005/08/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
Abstract An Erratum has been published for this article in Earth Surfaces Processes and Landforms 25(13) 2005, 1683–1686. Recent determinations of soil production from in situ cosmogenic nuclides indicate that production decreases exponentially with soil depth. This contrasts with a long‐held assumption that maximum soil production occurs under a soil cover of finite depth. Sites in the Blue Mountains, Australia, show a sharp decrease of soil depth where vegetation changes from forested plateau surfaces to heath‐covered spurs, and bands of bare rock in the heath suggest that soil production depends on presence of a finite depth of soil. The substrate varies from hard ferruginized sandstone to soft saprolite. In situ 10 Be determinations indicate that apparent rates of erosion and soil production are greater under the relatively thin heath soil than under the thicker forest soil but, in contrast to other studies, these sites do not show significant depth‐dependence of apparent soil production. The pattern reflects both hardness variation in the rock substrate and the effect of Late Quaternary climatic change. Optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dating indicates that soil ≤30 cm depth is of Holocene age whereas the deeper soil is substantially older. The age‐break coincides with a stone line interpreted as a former surface lag deposit. Assuming that pre‐Holocene soil depths were 30 cm less than today, recalculated soil production tends to decrease with increasing depth. Soil production at this site requires soil cover but bare rock patches and vegetation comprise a shifting mosaic. In the long term, average rates of erosion and soil production decrease with increasing soil depth. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.