2025/12/12 by Alan Bonomi, Francesco Banelli, Bonomi, Alan +3 · 1 citation
Computer Science · Engineering · Mathematics · Physics and Astronomy · #Anomaly detection #Displacement (psychology) #Estimator #Flow (mathematics) #Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows #Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis #Image (mathematics) #Model Reduction and Neural Networks #Particle image velocimetry #Particle tracking velocimetry #Smoothness #Velocimetry #cs.CV #eess.IV #math.OC #physics.flu-dyn
paper · pdf · open access · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.11695
published in arXiv (Cornell University) (Cornell University)
openalex publication_date 2025/12/12 · openalex created_date 2025/12/16 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) is among the central modalities for measuring flow fields across laboratory, industrial and environmental setting. Traditional PIV approaches typically depend on tuning parameters specific to the imaging setup, making the performance sensitive to variations in illumination, flow conditions, and seeding density. Similarly, state-of-the-art machine learning methods for flow quantification are fragile outside their training set. In our experiments, we observed that flow quantification would improve if different tunings (or algorithms) were applied to different regions of the same image pair. Motivated by this observation, we thus pose flow quantification as a multi-estimator fusion problem: several heterogeneous algorithms process the same image pair in parallel, and their dense flow fields are treated as complementary estimates. To fuse them, we adopt a consensus framework based on the alternating direction method of multipliers, incorporating priors such as smoothness and incompressibility. We perform several numerical experiments to demonstrate the benefits of this approach. For instance, we achieve a decrease in end-point-error of up to 20% of a dense-inverse-search estimator at an inference rate of 60Hz, and we show how performance can be increased with outlier rejection. Our method is implemented in JAX and integrated into Flow Gym, enabling reproducible comparisons with the state of the art and systematic evaluation across different base algorithms. Finally, we demonstrate successful deployment of our method in the same real-world active-fluids-control setup of Terpin and D'Andrea [1], where a reinforcement-learning agent uses our flow estimates to learn to minimize drag (down by 36%) or maximize it (up to 32%) with only two minutes of real-world interaction. Hardware and software are made available at ActiveFluidControl.com.