2005/05/19 by Franz Gähler, Gähler, Franz, John Hunton +3 · 1 citation
Computer Science · Materials Science · Physics and Astronomy · #37B50 #52C23 #Advanced Mathematical Theories and Applications #Cellular Automata and Applications #FOS: Physical sciences #Mathematical Physics (math-ph) #Quasicrystal Structures and Properties
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.math-ph/0505048
openalex publication_date 2005/05/19 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
The first author's recent unexpected discovery of torsion in the integral cohomology of the Tübingen Triangle Tiling has led to a re-evaluation of current descriptions of and calculational methods for the topological invariants associated with aperiodic tilings. The existence of torsion calls into question the previously assumed equivalence of cohomological and K-theoretic invariants as well as the supposed lack of torsion in the latter. In this paper we examine in detail the topological invariants of canonical projection tilings; we extend results of Forrest, Hunton and Kellendonk to give a full treatment of the torsion in the cohomology of such tilings in codimension at most 3, and present the additions and amendments needed to previous results and calculations in the literature. It is straightforward to give a complete treatment of the torsion components for tilings of codimension 1 and 2, but the case of codimension 3 is a good deal more complicated, and we illustrate our methods with the calculations of all four icosahedral tilings previously considered. Turning to the K-theoretic invariants, we show that cohomology and K-theory agree for all canonical projection tilings in (physical) dimension at most 3, thus proving the existence of torsion in, for example, the K-theory of the Tübingen Triangle Tiling. The question of the equivalence of cohomology and K-theory for tilings of higher dimensional euclidean space remains open.