2018/06/30 by Per Åhag, Per Ahag, Rafał Czyż +2 · 2 citations
Mathematics · #Composition (language) #Constant (computer programming) #Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows #Geometry and complex manifolds #Holomorphic and Operator Theory #Holomorphic function #Holomorphic functional calculus #Identity theorem #Morphism #math.CA #math.CV #msc:15A18 #msc:31C45 #msc:32A10 #msc:32U05 #msc:58E20
paper · pdf · doi:10.1080/17476933.2019.1574773
published in Complex Variables and Elliptic Equations 65(2), 152-177 (Taylor & Francis)
arxiv created 2018/08/27 · openalex publication_date 2019/02/27 · arxiv updated 2019/03/01 · openalex created_date 2019/06/27 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05
We study the problem of classifying the holomorphic (m,n)-subharmonic morphisms in complex space. This determines which holomorphic mappings preserves m-subharmonicity in the sense that the composition of the holomorphic mapping with a m-subharmonic functions is n-subharmonic. We show that there are three different scenarios depending on the underlying dimensions, and the model itself. Either the holomorphic mappings are just the constant functions, or up to composition with a homotethetic map, canonical orthogonal projections. Finally, there is a more intriguing case when subharmonicity is gained.