2025/04/17 by Janet Geipel, Constantinos Hadjichristidis, Luca Surian · 2 citations
Arts and Humanities · Psychology · Social Sciences · #Cultural Differences and Values #Economic Justice #Epistemology #Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies #Law #Philosophy #Political science #Psychology #Social and Intergroup Psychology #Social psychology
paper · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104747
published in Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 119, 104747 (Elsevier BV)
openalex publication_date 2025/04/17 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/25
Immanent justice thinking refers to the tendency to perceive causal connections between an agent's bad (good) deeds and subsequent bad (good) outcomes, even when such connections are rationally implausible. We asked bilinguals to read scenarios written either in their native language or in a foreign language and examined how language influences immanent justice endorsements. In five pre-registered, randomized experiments involving 1875 participants from two bilingual populations, we demonstrate that foreign language use increases immanent justice endorsements. This effect was largely unrelated to foreign language proficiency, emerged only for problems that could trigger immanent justice intuitions, and was eliminated by a prompt to think rationally. These results suggest that using a foreign language increases immanent justice endorsements by reducing awareness of the conflict between intuition and rational reasoning.