2019/08/11 by Tabish Qureshi · 1 voice
Computer Science · Physics and Astronomy · #Measure (data warehouse) #Mode (computer interface) #Particle (ecology) #Path (computing) #Quantum #Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture #Quantum Information and Cryptography #Quantum Mechanics and Applications #Quantum information #Subject (documents) #quant-ph
paper · pdf · doi:10.1088/1361-6404/ab923e
published as Eur. J. Phys. 41, 055403 (2020) · Published version
arxiv published 2019/08/11 · openalex created_date 2019/08/22 · openalex publication_date 2020/05/12 · arxiv created 2020/08/27 · arxiv updated 2020/08/28 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05
Abstract The delayed-choice quantum eraser has long been a subject of controversy, and has been looked at as being incomprehensible to having retro-causal effect in time. Here the delayed-choice quantum eraser is theoretically analyzed using standard quantum mechanics. Employing a Mach–Zehnder interferometer, instead of a conventional two-slit interference, brings in surprising clarity. Some common mistakes in interpreting the experiment are pointed out. It is demonstrated that in the delayed mode there is no which-way information present after the particle is registered on the screen or the final detectors, contrary to popular belief. However, it is shown that another kind of path information is present even after the particle is registered in the final detectors. The registered particle can be used to predict the results of certain yet to be made measurements on the which-way detector. This novel correlation can be tested in a careful experiment. It is consequently argued that there is no big mystery in the experiment, and no retro-causal effect whatsoever.