2012/07/28 by Shannon M. Risk · 1 citation
Social Sciences · Arts and Humanities · #Canadian Identity and History #Historical Gender and Feminism Studies #Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes #Suffrage #Legislature #Elite #Political science #Voting #House of Representatives #Public administration #Law #Gender studies #Sociology #Politics
paper · doi:10.1080/02722011.2012.705862
openalex publication_date 2012/07/28 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/29
In the 1890s, those opposed to women's suffrage in the borderlands of Maine and New Brunswick held a lot of the same arguments, but expressed them in different ways, and with different outcomes. In New Brunswick, the most vocal adversaries were male and represented in the Legislative Assembly. In Maine, a group of elite women, mostly from Portland, led the fight to keep women from voting. This article will explore the motivations, comparisons, and differences between the anti-suffragists of the borderlands, as well as explain some of the outcomes of the anti-suffrage movement that are still present today.