vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Different Ways to Estimate Graviton Mass

2017/12/22 by Alexander F. Zakharov, Predrag Jovanović, Predrag Jovanovic +3 · 1 citation
Physics and Astronomy · #Black hole (networking) #Constraint (computer-aided design) #Cosmology and Gravitation Theories #Gravitation #Gravitational wave #Graviton #Planet #Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research #Relativity and Gravitational Theory #gr-qc

paper · pdf · doi:10.1142/s2010194518600960

published as International Journal of Modern Physics: Conference Series, v 47 (2018) · 6 pages, presented as an invited talk at the XXXI International Workshop on High Energy Physics (IHEP, Protvino, Russia)

arxiv created 2017/12/22 · openalex publication_date 2018/01/01 · openalex created_date 2018/01/05 · arxiv updated 2018/06/26 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/06

Abstract

An experimental detection of graviton is extremely hard problem, however, there are different ways to evaluate a graviton mass if it is non-vanishing. Theories of massive gravity or theories with non-vanishing graviton mass initially have a number of pathologies such as discontinuities, ghosts etc. In last years theorists found ways to overcome weaknesses of such theories meanwhile observational features are also discussed. In the first publication reporting about the discovery of gravitational waves from the binary black hole system the LIGO-Virgo collaboration obtained the graviton mass constraint around [Formula: see text] eV (later the estimate was improved with new data). A comparable and consistent graviton mass constraint around [Formula: see text] eV has been obtained from analysis of the bright star S2 trajectory near the Galactic Center.

Citations

Cited by