2014/04/01 by Jon Hoover · 1 citation
Social Sciences · Arts and Humanities · Psychology · #Islamic Studies and History #Islamic Thought and Society Studies #Families in Therapy and Culture #Philosophy #Islam #Reinterpretation #Opposition (politics) #Theology
paper · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199696703.013.014
openalex publication_date 2014/04/01 · openalex created_date 2022/05/12 · openalex updated_date 2026/05/28
The Ḥanbalīs, as the most consistently traditionalist of the Sunnī law schools, had a disproportionate impact on the development of Islamic theology by providing a unified voice against<italic>Kalām</italic>. Many Ḥanbalīs rejected<italic>Kalām</italic>reinterpretation (<italic>taʾwīl</italic>) of anthropomorphism in the Qurʾān and Hadith and took a non-cognitive approach that affirmed God’s attributes without inquiring into their meaning or modality (<italic>bi-lā kayf</italic>). In the eleventh to thirteenth centuries, Abū Yaʿla, Ibn ʿAqīl, and Ibn Jawzī adopted<italic>Kalām</italic>views to varying degrees but faced stiff opposition from within their own Ḥanbalī ranks. In the fourteenth century Ibn Taymiyya also rejected<italic>Kalām</italic>theology but sought to interpret the meanings, although not the modalities, of God’s attributes to accord with his unique vision of God’s perpetual creativity. Ibn Taymiyya’s theological ideas were further developed by his student Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya and adopted by the Wahhābīs in the eighteenth century.