2003/06/24 by Rebecca L. Boulton, Michael F. Clarke · 1 citation
Environmental Science · Agricultural and Biological Sciences · #Avian ecology and behavior #Plant and animal studies #Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies #Predation #Nest (protein structural motif) #Ecology #Biology #Habitat #Predator #Reproductive success #Population
paper · doi:10.1071/wr02055
openalex publication_date 2003/06/24 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/06/11
We tested the hypothesis that predation rates increase near habitat edges and can cause low reproductive success in forest bird species living in a fragmented habitat. We constructed artificial yellow-faced honeyeater ( Lichenostomus chrysops ) nests and placed them 5 m, 20 m, 50 m and 200 m from the forest edge. We also monitored natural yellow-faced honeyeater nests at varying distances from the forest edge. Artificial nests experienced 43% predation over the 14-day exposure period, while natural yellow-faced honeyeater nests experienced 28% during the incubation period and 47% during the nestling period. No negative edge effect was detected for artificial or natural nests. In fact, natural nests experienced higher nest success closer to the forest edge. There was no increase in the number of avian predators recorded at the forest edge, even though birds were identified as the main predators at artificial nests (49%). The lack of support for both the 'ecological trap' and 'predator influx' hypotheses contributes to a growing body of evidence that suggests that not all species surviving in highly fragmented environments are negatively affected by edge effects.