2016/06/30 by Tatsuro Kawamoto, Yoshiyuki Kabashima · 1 citation
Computer Science · Mathematics · Physics and Astronomy · #Algorithm #Artificial intelligence #COVID-19 epidemiological studies #Cluster analysis #Complex Network Analysis Techniques #Computer science #Data mining #Focus (optics) #Inference #Machine learning #Mathematics #Model selection #Modularity (biology) #Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence #Overfitting #Selection (genetic algorithm) #Statistical inference #Statistics #Stochastic block model #cs.SI #physics.soc-ph
paper · pdf · doi:10.1103/physreve.97.022315
published as Phys. Rev. E 97, 022315 (2018) · 21 pages, 14 figures, 2 tables
openalex publication_date 2018/02/28 · arxiv created 2018/03/07 · arxiv updated 2018/03/08 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05
We conduct a comparative analysis on various estimates of the number of clusters in community detection. An exhaustive comparison requires testing of all possible combinations of frameworks, algorithms, and assessment criteria. In this paper we focus on the framework based on a stochastic block model, and investigate the performance of greedy algorithms, statistical inference, and spectral methods. For the assessment criteria, we consider modularity, map equation, Bethe free energy, prediction errors, and isolated eigenvalues. From the analysis, the tendency of overfit and underfit that the assessment criteria and algorithms have becomes apparent. In addition, we propose that the alluvial diagram is a suitable tool to visualize statistical inference results and can be useful to determine the number of clusters.