vix.ing · top · new · best · stats

Quantum measurement incompatibility does not imply Bell nonlocality

2017/07/31 by Flavien Hirsch, Marco Túlio Quintino, Nicolas Brunner · 79 citations
Arts and Humanities · Computer Science · Mathematics · Physics and Astronomy · #Alice and Bob #Bell state #Bell test experiments #Bell's theorem #Bipartite graph #Connection (principal bundle) #Discrete mathematics #Kochen–Specker theorem #Local hidden variable theory #Mathematics #Operator (biology) #Philosophy and History of Science #Physics #Quantum #Quantum Information and Cryptography #Quantum Mechanics and Applications #Quantum correlation #Quantum discord #Quantum entanglement #Quantum mechanics #Quantum nonlocality #quant-ph

paper · pdf · open access · doi:10.1103/physreva.97.012129

published in Physical Review A 97(1) (American Physical Society) · See also arXiv:1705.10069 for a related work Small changes on the main text. Some typos were fixed

openalex publication_date 2018/01/25 · arxiv created 2018/02/01 · arxiv updated 2018/02/02 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05

Abstract

We discuss the connection between the incompatibility of quantum measurements, as captured by the notion of joint measurability, and the violation of Bell inequalities. Specifically, we explicitly present a given set of non-jointly-measurable positive-operator-value measures (POVMs) MA with the following property. Considering a bipartite Bell test where Alice uses MA, then for any possible shared entangled state \ensuremathρ and any set of (possibly infinitely many) POVMs NB performed by Bob, the resulting statistics admits a local model and can thus never violate any Bell inequality. This shows that quantum measurement incompatibility does not imply Bell nonlocality in general.

Citations

Cited by