2020/11/09 by Milena Tripkovic · 1 citation
Social Sciences · Psychology · #Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis #Judicial and Constitutional Studies #Political Philosophy and Ethics #Citizenship #Punishment (psychology) #Legitimacy #Polity #Law #Political science #Law and economics #Sociology #Criminology #Psychology #Social psychology #Politics
paper · doi:10.1093/bjc/azaa085
openalex publication_date 2020/11/09 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/01
Abstract Citizenship deprivation is becoming an increasingly standard response of modern states to criminal and other harmful acts. Current academic attempts to determine the sanction’s legitimacy are, however, frustrated by the inadequate understanding of its nature. Departing from a dominant perspective that considers denationalization as punishment, this article conducts an original study of citizenship policies in 37 European democracies and contrasts them with key principles of punishment. The findings raise serious doubts regarding the penal nature of denationalization: I propose instead that denationalization is better understood as a sui generis sanction, which seeks to relieve the polity of those members who fail to satisfy fundamental citizenship requirements. This position has serious implications for our understanding and justification of modern revocation practices.