2014/05/27 by Daniel Radus · 1 citation
Social Sciences · Business, Management and Accounting · #Archaeology and Natural History #Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights #American History and Culture #Historiography #Narrative #Modernity #Rhetorical question #Possession (linguistics) #Print culture #History #Sovereignty #Presumption #Literature #Art #Art history #Law #Archaeology #Political science #Philosophy #Politics #Linguistics
paper · doi:10.1215/00029831-2646910
openalex publication_date 2014/05/27 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/05/21
As channels of print distribution and production widened in the early nineteenth century, Native Americans employed print as a means of expressing their pasts and thus their historical claims to territories coveted by the United States. In this essay, Radus shows how the nature of print in this period was at times incommensurate with the values and practices of Native historiography. Through an analysis of Sketches of Ancient History of the Six Nations (1827), Radus argues that Cusick, a Tuscarora historian, used various rhetorical and narrative techniques to alter the conventions of print so that the medium better conformed to the ideals of Haudenosaunee history telling. Sketches at once archives a history of Haudenosaunee territorial possession and subverts the presumption that printed texts afford access to any authoritative sense of the Haudenosaunee past. Cusick thereby assents to print modernity even as he refashions its premises in accord with his timely support for his nation’s territorial sovereignty.