vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

LIFE-HISTORY VARIATION IN THE SAGEBRUSH LIZARD: PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY OR LOCAL ADAPTATION?

2003/06/01 by Michael W. Sears, Michael J. Angilletta · 3 citations
Environmental Science · #Amphibian and Reptile Biology #Species Distribution and Climate Change #Wildlife Ecology and Conservation #Phenotypic plasticity #Adaptation (eye) #Ecology #Lizard #Variation (astronomy) #Local adaptation #Life history #Biology #Life history theory #Geography #Demography

paper · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[1624:lvitsl]2.0.co;2

openalex publication_date 2003/06/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/22

Abstract

We performed a laboratory common-environment study to determine the genetic and environmental sources of variation in growth rates of the sagebrush lizard (Sceloporus graciosus). Hatchling lizards were reared from gravid females collected from three study populations along an elevational gradient in southern Utah, USA. Hatchlings were fed ad libidum and were maintained on a 14:10 light:dark cycle, with temperatures at 338C and 218C during photophase and scotophase, respectively. Each hatchling was randomly assigned to either a water-supplementation treatment or a control group receiving no supplemental water. Once every five days, the water-supplemented lizards were admin- istered orally a quantity of water equal to 5% of their body mass. Growth was quantified as the total change in body size (length and mass) for 30 d after hatching. Resting metabolic rates of a subset of lizards were measured at hatching and at the end of the study. After adjusting growth for food intake, change in length did not differ between water-supple- mented and control lizards, and did not differ among the three populations. Metabolic rates were similar across the study for all treatment groups. Water-supplemented lizards did gain wet mass more rapidly than control lizards; however, the difference in growth between groups was attributed to hydration state, because growth in dry mass did not differ between groups. The effects of water supplementation on growth that were observed by other in- vestigators were likely manifested through changes in thermoregulatory behavior or in- creased activity.

Citations

Cited by