2012/01/01 by Alexander Flores · 1 citation
Social Sciences · Medicine · #German legal, social, and political studies #Italian Fascism and Post-war Society #Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity #Nazism #Ideology #Argument (complex analysis) #Politics #Nazi Germany #Judaism #Political science #Spanish Civil War #Law #World War II #Scope (computer science) #Sociology #Religious studies #History #Philosophy #Medicine #Computer science #Archaeology
paper · doi:10.1163/15700607-201200a9
openalex publication_date 2012/01/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/05/21
One of the main constituents of the so-called Islamofascism is, in the eyes of those who subscribe to this conception, the close affinity of Arabs (and sometimes, Muslims) to Nazi ideology and possibly practice. To bolster this notion, its proponents do basically three things: first, they try to prove that a massive majority of Arabs took a pro-Nazi stand during the Third Reich and especially during World War II and that important Arab figures collaborated with Nazi Germany during the War. Secondly, they point to widespread—real and alleged—anti-Jewish beliefs among present-day Arabs. And thirdly, they claim that there is a personal, political and ideological continuity between both phenomena and that, thus, present-day Arab Judeophobia has the same character, scope and possible effect as the anti-Semitism of the Nazis. During the War, so the argument goes, Arab attitudes were part and parcel of Nazi ideology, and they largely retained this quality although, after the War, Nazism was overcome in Europe. In this article, three more recent publications which subscribe to the above mentioned argument will be critically discussed.