2015/11/30 by Kwan Chuen Chan, Ravi K. Sheth, Roman Scoccimarro +1 · 20 citations
Mathematics · Physics and Astronomy · #Astrophysics #Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena #Convolution (computer science) #Correlation function (quantum field theory) #Cosmology #Cosmology and Gravitation Theories #Dark energy #Excursion #Function (biology) #Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena #Galaxy #Gaussian #Halo #Halo effect #Mathematics #Matter power spectrum #Physics #Quantum mechanics #Spectral density #Statistical physics #Statistics #Window function #astro-ph.CO
paper · pdf · doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.103543
published in Physical review. D/Physical review. D. 96(10) (American Physical Society) · 15 pages, 14 figures, matched the published version, discussion and presentation significantly improved, conclusions unchanged
arxiv created 2017/11/23 · openalex publication_date 2017/11/27 · arxiv updated 2017/12/06 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05
The window function for protohalos in Lagrangian space is often assumed to be a top hat in real space. We measure this profile directly and find that it is more extended than a top hat but less extended than a Gaussian; its shape is well described by rounding the edges of the top hat by convolution with a Gaussian that has a scale length about 5 times smaller. This effective window Weff is particularly simple in Fourier space, and has an analytic form in real space. Together with the excursion set bias parameters, Weff describes the scale-dependence of the Lagrangian halo-matter cross correlation up to kRLag\ensuremath∼10, where RLag is the Lagrangian size of the protohalo. Moreover, with this Weff, all the spectral moments of the power spectrum are finite, allowing a straightforward estimate of the excursion set peak mass function. This estimate requires a prescription of the critical overdensity enclosed within a protohalo if it is to collapse, which we calibrate from simulations. We find that the resulting estimate of halo abundances is only accurate to about 20%, and we discuss why: a top hat in ``infall time'' towards the protohalo center need not correspond to a top hat in the initial spatial distribution, so models in which infall rather than smoothed overdensity is the relevant variable may be more accurate.