Unfounded dumbfounding: How harm and purity undermine evidence for moral dumbfounding

2017/08/11 by Steve Guglielmo · 1 citation
Decision Sciences · Neuroscience · Psychology · #Cognitive science #Emotions and Moral Behavior #Epistemology #Ethics in Business and Education #Harm #Intuition #Moral authority #Moral development #Moral disengagement #Moral psychology #Moral reasoning #Philosophy #Pluralism (philosophy) #Psychology #Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment #Social cognitive theory of morality #Social intuitionism #Social psychology

paper · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.08.002

openalex publication_date 2017/08/11 · crossref created 2017/08/11 · crossref issued 2018/01/01 · crossref published 2018/01/01 · crossref published-print 2018/01/01 · crossref deposited 2023/08/24 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · crossref indexed 2026/01/05 · openalex updated_date 2026/01/13

Citations

• Mapping the moral domain.
• Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory
• Morality in everyday life
• Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.
• The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
• The curious tale of Julie and Mark: Unraveling the moral dumbfounding effect
• International Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning

Cited by

• Social intuitionism [wikipedia]