vix.ing · top · new · best · stats

Social dominance orientation and the political psychology of gender: A case of invariance?

1994/12/01 by Jim Sidanius, Felicia Pratto, Lawrence D. Bobo · 442 citations
Social Sciences · Psychology · #Social and Intergroup Psychology #Cultural Differences and Values #Social and Cultural Dynamics #Social dominance orientation #Psychology #Social psychology #Dominance (genetics) #Biology and political orientation #Politics #Political psychology #Measurement invariance #Structural equation modeling #Confirmatory factor analysis #Political science #Statistics #Authoritarianism

paper · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.998

published in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67(6), 998-1011 (American Psychological Association)

openalex publication_date 1994/12/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/04

Abstract

Social dominance theory assumes transsituational and transcultural differences between men and women in social dominance orientation (SDO), with men showing higher levels of SDO than women. SDO is a general individual-difference variable expressing preference for superordinate in-group status, hierarchical relationships between social groups, and a view of group relations as inherently 0-sum. Data from a random sample of 1,897 respondents from Los Angeles County confirmed the notion that men have significantly higher social dominance scores than women and that these differences were consistent across cultural, demographic, and situational factors such as age, social class, religion, educational level, political ideology, ethnicity, racism, region of national origin, and gender-role relevant opinion. The theoretical implications are discussed.

Citations

Cited by