2015/04/10 by Roger A. Mason · 6 citations
Arts and Humanities · Economics, Econometrics and Finance · #Scottish History and National Identity #Historical Studies on Spain #Historical Economic and Social Studies #Sovereignty #Scots #Monarchy #Unitary state #State (computer science) #Population #Independence (probability theory) #Law #Political science #Popular sovereignty #Sociology #Politics #Philosophy #Demography
paper · doi:10.3366/jshs.2015.0138
published in Journal of Scottish Historical Studies 35(1), 1-24 (Edinburgh University Press)
openalex publication_date 2015/04/10 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/05/21
This article deploys the concept of multiple monarchy as a means of reassessing the constitutional relationship between Scotland and England from the union of the crowns in 1603 to the union of parliaments in 1707. It argues that the Scots’ belief in their kingdom's historic independence, symbolised by the Stuart dynasty itself, led them to conceive of the union with England as one of equals, but that such parity of status and esteem was rendered unsustainable by inequalities of population and resources that became more marked as the century progressed. Reviewing the implications of a century of religious and constitutional upheaval, it argues that the Revolution of 1689-90 created an unworkable constitutional settlement founded on the sovereignty of the crown in two parliaments rather than one and that this was resolved in 1707 by the creation of a unitary British state, built on the illusion of equality and partnership, but enshrining English dominance.