vix.ing · top · new · best · stats

Schubert's inflections of Classical form

1997/04/17 by Charles Rosen · 53 citations
Arts and Humanities · Computer Science · Psychology · #Musicology and Musical Analysis #Music Technology and Sound Studies #Art #Humanities #Communication #Literature #Art history #Psychology

paper · doi:10.1017/ccol9780521482295.006

published in Cambridge University Press eBooks, 72-98 (Cambridge University Press)

openalex publication_date 1997/04/17 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/30

Abstract

The mimetic elements of Gretchen am Spinnrade (D118) have always been easily identified, and they are amazingly specific: the right-hand sempre ligato represents the turning wheel; in the left, the tenor sempre staccato imitates the continuous clicking sound of the spinning, and the bass (particularly in measures 4 and 6) the occasional impulse that the spinner's foot must give to the pedal. These elements dominate the opening of Schubert's first acknowledged masterpiece of October 19, 1814 (see Ex. 4.1, measures 1–16). And every music student knows that the imitation gives the basic structure of the song at its climax: as Gretchen remembers Faust's kiss, the wheel ceases to spin, only to start up again as she returns to the contemplation of her sorrow and her despair. Mimesis determines the song in other ways as well, one aspect already revealed in the first sixteen measures. First, however, we should remark the faulty declamation. The meaning of the opening lines demands accents on “hin” and “schwer.” However, my peace is gone, my heart is heavy, is Schubert's odd emphasis, which goes against the sense, as if another state of mind could be gone, some other organ heavy. But it makes a better sound: “Ruh” has a more beautiful and agreeable vowel for singing than “hin,” and it is clear that musical considerations take priority over meaning and prosody for Schubert, and they continue to do so until the end of his life.

Cited by