2014/12/01 by Matthew R. Goodrum · 11 citations
Arts and Humanities · Social Sciences · #Anthropology #Archaeology #Context (archaeology) #Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis #History #Human evolution #Paleoanthropology #Paleopathology and ancient diseases #Pleistocene #Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology #Prehistoric archaeology #Prehistory #Sociology
paper · doi:10.1086/679420
published in Isis 105(4), 706-733 (University of Chicago Press)
openalex publication_date 2014/12/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2025/11/06
Paleoanthropology emerged as a science during the late nineteenth century. The discovery of prehistoric artifacts in Pleistocene deposits soon led to the excavation of fossilized human bones. The archaeologists and geologists who unearthed them were primarily concerned with determining whether the human fossils and the artifacts found with them actually dated from the Pleistocene, thus offering evidence for the geological antiquity of humans. Prehistoric archaeologists reconstructed the way of life of prehistoric peoples through the artifacts found, while anthropologists examined the human fossils. They wanted primarily to identify the races of prehistoric humans. It was within this context that French anthropologists began to use the term "paléo-anthropologie" to refer to a new scientific discipline devoted to the study of prehistoric human races and human paleontology. This essay examines how paleoanthropology was defined as a science during the 1870s and 1880s. It shows that a tension existed between the objectives and methods of archaeologists and anthropologists. Paul Topinard criticized archaeologists and argued that a new type of scientist; the paleoanthropologist trained in anatomy or zoology, was needed to study human fossils properly.